Shirley Remmert v. USHUD, et al
SAN MATEO COUNTY DISTRICT ATTORNEY, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, TARA E. HEUMANN, Deputy District Attorney, FAITH GARCIA, Supervisor, JACK DEMPSEY, Housing Programs Specialist and ISABEL ROMERO, FSS/MTW Coordinator |
SHIRLEY V. REMMERT |
21-15400 |
March 8, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: TSP) Granting Motion to dismiss the case filed by Appellant Shirley V. Remmert; Dismissing case pursuant to FRAP 42(b) . This order shall constitute the mandate.,[12067046] (TSP) [Entered: 04/07/2021 04:13 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed Appellant Shirley V. Remmert motion to dismiss the case. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/30/2021. [12063138] (DJV) [Entered: 04/05/2021 09:36 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Shirley V. Remmert motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/19/2021. [12053013] (DJV) [Entered: 03/25/2021 10:04 AM] |
Filing 3 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court. [12030301] (RR) [Entered: 03/10/2021 04:31 AM] |
Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12030252] (CKP) [Entered: 03/10/2021 12:30 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Shirley V. Remmert opening brief due 04/30/2021. [12027241] --[Edited: Attached corrected PDF of docketing letter. 03/09/2021 by TYL] (JPD) [Entered: 03/08/2021 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.