Macario Marruffo v. David Shinn, et al
Respondent / Appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director and ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Petitioner / Appellant: MACARIO IGNACIO MARRUFFO
Case Number: 21-15652
Filed: April 14, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 9, 2021 Filing 11 Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and RYAN D. NELSON) Appellants notice of appeal was dated March 29, 2021, and was received by the district court on April 12, 2021. A review of the record and appellants responses to the April 26, 2021 order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the March 1, 2021 magistrate judge order challenged in the March 29, 2021 notice of appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The Clerk will transmit appellants notice of appeal filed in this court on May 10, 2021 (Docket Entry No. [ # 8 ]) to the district court for filing as a notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on April 12, 2021. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12139065] (JBS) [Entered: 06/09/2021 01:47 PM]
May 10, 2021 Filing 10 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo notice of appeal (response to order to show cause). Served on 05/04/2021. [12109695] (RL) [Entered: 05/11/2021 04:27 PM]
May 6, 2021 Filing 9 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo motion to notify AZ. Atty. Gen.'s Office of civil complaint to be filed. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/28/2021. [12104849] (RL) [Entered: 05/06/2021 02:24 PM]
May 5, 2021 Filing 8 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo request for COA under special action. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/20/2021. [12103163] (RL) [Entered: 05/05/2021 01:58 PM]
May 3, 2021 Filing 7 ENTRY UPDATED. Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo exhibit. Not dated. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12100664] [12100664]--[Edited 05/04/2021 by RL] (RL) [Entered: 05/03/2021 05:23 PM]
May 3, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo motion for cross-appeal. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/22/2021. [12100323] (RL) [Entered: 05/03/2021 03:24 PM]
April 30, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo letter dated re: Exhibit. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12098417] (JFF) [Entered: 04/30/2021 02:04 PM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 4 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CO): Appellants notice of appeal is dated March 29, 2021, and was received by the district court on April 12, 2021. A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the March 29, 2021 notice of appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court). To date, appellant has not filed a notice of appeal from the district courts final judgment entered on April 12, 2021. Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant must move for voluntary dismissal of this appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is stayed. [12085919] (CKP) [Entered: 04/25/2021 07:46 PM]
April 15, 2021 Filing 3 Received copy of motion filed inUnited States District Court District of Arizona re: Motion of objection with notice US Dist. Ct. is discriminating and has overroad higher clearly established law. Motion filed by Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo. [12076278] (RL) [Entered: 04/15/2021 04:01 PM]
April 15, 2021 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Macario Ignacio Marruffo motion of appeal with petition for review with request to issue COA. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/11/2021. [12076273] (RL) [Entered: 04/15/2021 03:58 PM]
April 14, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/12/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12073639] (JBS) [Entered: 04/14/2021 09:42 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Macario Marruffo v. David Shinn, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: DAVID SHINN, Director
Represented By: Karen Elizabeth Moody Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: ATTORNEY GENERAL FOR THE STATE OF ARIZONA
Represented By: Karen Elizabeth Moody Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: MACARIO IGNACIO MARRUFFO
Represented By: Macario Ignacio Marruffo
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?