Craig Wimberly v. Kathleen Alician, et al
| KATHLEEN ALICIAN, Director of the Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation, RALPH DIAZ, Secretary of CDCR, A. CUEVAS, Sgt at SQSP - Visting Room and RON DAVIS, Warden of San Quentin State Prison |
| CRAIG WIMBERLY |
| 21-15720 |
| April 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| CRAIG WIMBERLY V. KATHLEEN ALICIAN |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner completed authorization fee order. [12140345] (CKP) [Entered: 06/10/2021 11:21 AM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Craig Wimberly motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12118034] (RR) [Entered: 05/19/2021 11:54 AM] |
| Filing 4 Filed original and 0 copies of Appellant Craig Wimberly opening brief of 6 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 05/05/2021. [12116205] (KWG) [Entered: 05/18/2021 09:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Received PLRA authorization response from appellant. Dated 05/05/2021. [12108920] (RR) [Entered: 05/11/2021 10:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12088985] (CKP) [Entered: 04/27/2021 03:39 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Craig Wimberly opening brief due 06/18/2021. Appellee A. Cuevas answering brief due 07/19/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12085371] (JPD) [Entered: 04/23/2021 02:42 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
