Joe McNeely v. Theresa Cisneros, et al
Respondent / Appellee: KEN CLARK, Warden, STU SHERMAN and THERESA CISNEROS
Petitioner / Appellant: JOE D. MCNEELY
Case Number: 21-15864
Filed: May 13, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 28, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 28, 2021 Filing 9 Terminated Appellee Ken Clark in 21-15864 (Substituted by Appellee Theresa Cisneros in 21-15864). [12155700] (TYL) [Entered: 06/28/2021 09:22 AM]
June 28, 2021 Filing 8 Appellee Stu Sherman in 21-15864 substituted by Appellee Theresa Cisneros in 21-15864 [12155698] (TYL) [Entered: 06/28/2021 09:21 AM]
June 21, 2021 Filing 7 Filed Appellant Joe D. McNeely motion/request for stay & abeyance or enlargement of time. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/13/2021. [12150429] (RL) [Entered: 06/22/2021 09:41 AM]
June 8, 2021 Filing 6 Filed Appellant Joe D. McNeely motion for pre hearing discovery of evidence that may compel this Court of Appeals to order an evidentiary hearing. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/03/2021. [12137930] (RL) [Entered: 06/08/2021 03:24 PM]
June 8, 2021 Filing 5 Filed Appellant Joe D. McNeely motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/03/2021. [12137923] (RL) [Entered: 06/08/2021 03:21 PM]
May 18, 2021 Filing 4 Filed Appellant Joe D. McNeely request for certificate of appealability; notice of appeal amendment/supplemental to the Court of Appeals regarding a judgement/order of the Northern District Court. Deficiencies: None. Served on 05/13/2021. [12116894] (RL) [Entered: 05/18/2021 01:46 PM]
May 14, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellee Stu Sherman Correspondence: Notice to Ninth Circuit of Proper Appellee. Date of service: 05/14/2021 [12113058] [21-15864] (Baskind, David) [Entered: 05/14/2021 10:06 AM]
May 13, 2021 Filing 2 Received copy of amended notice of appeal from district court filed on 05/07/2021. [12112974] (QDL) [Entered: 05/14/2021 09:26 AM]
May 13, 2021 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 04/13/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12112232] (RT) [Entered: 05/13/2021 02:27 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Joe McNeely v. Theresa Cisneros, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: KEN CLARK, Warden
Represented By: David M. Baskind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: STU SHERMAN
Represented By: David M. Baskind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: THERESA CISNEROS
Represented By: David M. Baskind
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: JOE D. MCNEELY
Represented By: Joe D. McNeely
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?