Paul Timberlake v. Kelly Santoro
PAUL EDWARD TIMBERLAKE |
KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden |
21-16406 |
August 27, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on September 9, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Paul Edward Timberlake Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 09/09/2021. [12224638] [21-16406] (Arfa, Fay) [Entered: 09/09/2021 03:30 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 08/25/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12213388] (WL) [Entered: 08/27/2021 10:25 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Paul Timberlake v. Kelly Santoro | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: PAUL EDWARD TIMBERLAKE | |
Represented By: | Fay Arfa Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden | |
Represented By: | Ross K. Naughton |
Represented By: | Ross Kerr Naughton |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.