Jordan Smith v. Kaipo Sarkission, et al
| JORDAN AARON SMITH |
| KAIPO SARKISSION, ACO, MICHAEL BALA, Nurse, DOCTOR LETTICH, Psych (formerly known as Dr. Jane Doe), BERKEY, ACO (formerly known as ACO John Doe), EVERETT KANINAU, LYLE ANTONIO, Chief of Security, GARY CAPLAIN, SCOTT HARRINGTON, DOVIE BORGES, JOANNA WHITE, CALVIN MOCK, NOLAN ESPINDA and MONICA CHUN |
| 21-16581 |
| September 28, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: DA) Appellants motion for voluntary dismissal of this appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 3 ]) is granted. This appeal is dismissed. See Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). The courts September 28, 2021 order directing appellant to submit a prisoner authorization form is vacated. This order served on the district court shall act as and for the mandate of this court. [12261343] (JPD) [Entered: 10/19/2021 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Jordan Aaron Smith motion to withdraw notice of appeal. Deficiencies: None. . [12257053] (RR) [Entered: 10/14/2021 12:16 PM] |
| Filing 2 CLERK ORDER FILED (Deputy Clerk CKP) Prisoner fee authorization form sent to prisoner. [12241507] (CKP) [Entered: 09/28/2021 12:31 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 10/25/2021. Transcript due 11/23/2021. Appellant Jordan Aaron Smith opening brief due 01/03/2022. Appellees answering brief due 02/01/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12241194] (JMR) [Entered: 09/28/2021 10:06 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
