Patrick Shin v. USA
PATRICK SHIN |
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA |
21-16833 |
November 1, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 3, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 2 Fee status changed ( [Case Number 21-16833: Paid] ). [12276908] (OC) [Entered: 11/03/2021 10:46 AM] |
Filing 1 Petition for Writ of Error Coram Nobis - The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 11/29/2021. Transcript due 12/28/2021. Appellant Patrick Shin opening brief due 02/07/2022. Appellee United States of America answering brief due 03/08/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12274297] (OC) [Entered: 11/01/2021 12:33 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Patrick Shin v. USA | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: PATRICK SHIN | |
Represented By: | Thomas Mineo Otake |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent / appellee: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA | |
Represented By: | Sara Ayabe |
Represented By: | Michael Nammar Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.