Matthew Wright v. Michael Hathaway, et al
Defendant: ELIZABETH HAINLINE and WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Defendant / Appellee: TRACY SCHNEIDER, WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, RONALD FREDERICK, MICHAEL HATHAWAY, TAMMY O'REILLY, MELVIN HOPKINS, Mailroom Sergeant and STATE OF WASHINGTON
Plaintiff / Appellant: MATTHEW WRIGHT
Case Number: 21-35026
Filed: January 12, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
February 23, 2022 MATTHEW WRIGHT V. MICHAEL HATHAWAY

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on March 1, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
March 1, 2021 Filing 4 Streamlined request [3] by Appellant Matthew Wright to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellant Matthew Wright opening brief due 04/14/2021. Appellees Ronald Frederick, Michael Hathaway, Melvin Hopkins, Tammy O'Reilly, Tracy Schneider, State of Washington and Washington State Department of Corrections answering brief due 05/14/2021. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12020594] (BG) [Entered: 03/01/2021 04:32 PM]
March 1, 2021 Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellant Matthew Wright. New requested due date is 04/14/2021. [12020490] [21-35026] (Parker, Darryl) [Entered: 03/01/2021 03:55 PM]
January 12, 2021 Filing 2 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Matthew Wright opening brief due 03/15/2021. Appellees State of Washington, et al. answering brief due 04/12/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [11961347] (JPD) [Entered: 01/12/2021 04:00 PM]
January 12, 2021 Filing 1 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Entered in error. Correct entry to follow. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. [11961138] (JPD) [Entered: 01/12/2021 02:35 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Matthew Wright v. Michael Hathaway, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TRACY SCHNEIDER
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: RONALD FREDERICK
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MICHAEL HATHAWAY
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TAMMY O'REILLY
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: MELVIN HOPKINS, Mailroom Sergeant
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: STATE OF WASHINGTON
Represented By: Timothy J. Feulner Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: ELIZABETH HAINLINE
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL AND HEALTH SERVICES
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: MATTHEW WRIGHT
Represented By: Darryl Parker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?