Edward Stevens v. Terema Carlin
TEREMA CARLIN |
EDWARD STEVENS |
21-35091 |
February 3, 2021 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 10, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Edward Stevens Motion for certificate of appealability. Date of service: 03/10/2021. [12030357] [21-35091] (Benjamin, Dennis) [Entered: 03/10/2021 07:32 AM] |
Filing 2 Criminal Justice Act electronic voucher created. (Counsel: Mr. Dennis Alan Benjamin, Esquire for Edward Stevens) [12010027] (TG) [Entered: 02/19/2021 02:31 PM] |
Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 01/05/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [11991713] (WL) [Entered: 02/03/2021 03:04 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Search for this case: Edward Stevens v. Terema Carlin | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Respondent: TEREMA CARLIN | |
Represented By: | L. LaMont Anderson |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Petitioner / appellant: EDWARD STEVENS | |
Represented By: | Dennis Alan Benjamin Esquire |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.