Linda Senn v. Kyle Smith, et al
Defendant: JEFFREY MCDANIEL, LARRY GRAHAM, CITY OF PORTLAND, MULTNOMAH COUNTY and JOHN DOES, 1-10
Plaintiff / Appellee: LINDA SENN
Defendant / Appellant: KYLE SMITH
Case Number: 21-35293
Filed: April 19, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
March 18, 2022 LINDA SENN V. KYLE SMITH
June 8, 2022 Summary LINDA SENN V. KYLE SMITH

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on June 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
June 2, 2021 Filing 8 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. [12131664] (MS) [Entered: 06/02/2021 03:10 PM]
May 12, 2021 Filing 7 Added Attorney(s) Athul K. Acharya for party(s) Appellee Linda Senn, in case 21-35293. [12110446] (NAC) [Entered: 05/12/2021 11:14 AM]
May 12, 2021 Filing 6 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Athul K. Acharya (Public Accountability, 1622 NE Couch St, Portland, OR 97232) for Appellee Linda Senn. Date of service: 05/12/2021. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12110435] [21-35293] (Acharya, Athul) [Entered: 05/12/2021 11:10 AM]
May 4, 2021 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC ): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties shall address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Villanueva v. California, 986 F.3d 1158, 1164 (9th Cir. 2021) (court of appeals has jurisdiction over interlocutory appeal from denial of qualified immunity only to the extent that it turns on an issue of law) (citation omitted). The previously established briefing schedule remains in effect. [12102178] (RT) [Entered: 05/04/2021 04:55 PM]
April 27, 2021 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL IN AssessmentConference, 06/02/2021, 2:30 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12088768] (LW) [Entered: 04/27/2021 02:25 PM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 04/26/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12086659]. [21-35293] (AD) [Entered: 04/26/2021 12:44 PM]
April 26, 2021 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Kyle Smith Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 04/26/2021. [12086519] [21-35293] (Jones, B.) [Entered: 04/26/2021 11:27 AM]
April 19, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kyle Smith Mediation Questionnaire due on 04/26/2021. Transcript ordered by 05/17/2021. Transcript due 06/15/2021. Appellant Kyle Smith opening brief due 07/26/2021. Appellee Linda Senn answering brief due 08/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12079752] (RT) [Entered: 04/19/2021 04:48 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Linda Senn v. Kyle Smith, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JEFFREY MCDANIEL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: LARRY GRAHAM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: CITY OF PORTLAND
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: MULTNOMAH COUNTY
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: LINDA SENN
Represented By: Juan Chavez
Represented By: Athul K. Acharya
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: KYLE SMITH
Represented By: B. Andrew Jones
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?