Gene Palmer, II v. King County, et al
| GENE ALFRED PALMER II |
| KING COUNTY, a municipal corporation, KING COUNTY PROSECUTOR'S OFFICE, a subdivision of King County, a municipal corporation, SEATTLE POLICE DEPARTMENT, a subdivision of City of Seattle, a municipal corporation, JENNY ANNE DURKAN, individually and as a former U.S. Attorney, US ATTORNEY'S OFFICE, COLLEEN RAFTIS, Officer, JANE DOE DURKAN, JOHN DOE RAFTIS and JOHN AND JANE DOES, 1-50; inclusive |
| 21-35698 |
| August 23, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 19, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Sent Appellant a copy of docket entry number seven in response to his telephone request. [12261329] (JR) [Entered: 10/19/2021 11:22 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: AT): A review of the record reflects that this appeal may be frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), OR (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellees may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal remains stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, and (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss this appeal or statement that the appeal should go forward. [12235194] (RT) [Entered: 09/21/2021 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Gene Alfred Palmer, II motion to appoint pro bono counsel. Deficiencies: None. [12233640] (QDL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 03:16 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed Appellant Gene Alfred Palmer, II motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12233632] (QDL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 03:13 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellees King County and King County Prosecutor's Office Correspondence: Notice of Change of Address of Attorney Ann M. Summers. Date of service: 09/20/2021 [12232985] [21-35698] (Summers, Ann) [Entered: 09/20/2021 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Gene Alfred Palmer, II motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12220117] (NAC) [Entered: 09/03/2021 12:38 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12208908] (CKP) [Entered: 08/23/2021 02:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Gene Alfred Palmer II opening brief due 10/25/2021. Appellees Jane Doe Durkan, Jenny Anne Durkan, John And Jane Does, King County, King County Prosecutor's Office, Colleen Raftis, John Doe Raftis, Seattle Police Department and US Attorney's Office answering brief due 11/26/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12208266] (RT) [Entered: 08/23/2021 09:47 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
