Keen Smith, Jr. v. Palmer Courthouse, et al
| KEEN L.A. SMITH, Jr. |
| PALMER COURTHOUSE and GOOSE CREEK CORRECTIONAL CENTER |
| 21-35721 |
| August 26, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 20, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and BRIDGET S. BADE) The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Wilson v. Belleque, 554 F.3d 816, 825-26 (9th Cir. 2009). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12232608] (WL) [Entered: 09/20/2021 08:44 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 07/01/2021. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12212646] (JMR) [Entered: 08/26/2021 02:58 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
