Samuel Kent v. U.S. Office of the Inspector G, et al
| SAMUEL JAMES KENT |
| U.S. OFFICE OF THE INSPECTOR GENERAL and U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR |
| 21-35739 |
| September 1, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 17, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed order (MICHAEL DALY HAWKINS, PAUL J. WATFORD and KENNETH K. LEE) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Silberkleit v. Kantrowitz, 713 F.2d 433, 434 (9th Cir. 1983) (order granting or denying a stay of proceedings is not generally a final decision appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable); Green v. Occidental Petroleum Corp., 541 F.2d 1335, 1338 (9th Cir. 1976) (district court must be of the opinion that the criteria of section 1292(b) are met; court of appeals is without authority to assume an appeal unilaterally). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12231840] (WL) [Entered: 09/17/2021 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Samuel James Kent opening brief due 11/01/2021. Appellees U.S. Department of the Interior and U.S. Office of the Inspector General answering brief due 11/29/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12217737] (JMR) [Entered: 09/01/2021 11:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
