Virginia Ward v. Safeco Insurance Company
| VIRGINIA WARD |
| SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA |
| 21-35757 |
| September 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
 VIRGINIA WARD V. SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY
|
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 30, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LBS): Appellants unopposed motion (Docket Entry No. [ # 5 ] ) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due January 7, 2022. The answering brief is due February 7, 2022. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12244427] (RT) [Entered: 09/30/2021 04:22 PM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN Assessment Conference, 10/26/2021, 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time (originally scheduled on 10/15/2021). [12239903] (BLS) [Entered: 09/27/2021 12:37 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellant Virginia Ward Unopposed Motion to extend time to file Opening brief until 01/07/2022. Date of service: 09/24/2021. [12238694] [21-35757] (Palmer, Rex) [Entered: 09/24/2021 03:33 PM] |
| Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 10/15/2021, 1:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12237904] (VS) [Entered: 09/24/2021 09:05 AM] |
| Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 09/16/2021. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12231108]. [21-35757] (AD) [Entered: 09/16/2021 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Virginia Ward Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 09/16/2021. [12230564] [21-35757] (Palmer, Rex) [Entered: 09/16/2021 01:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Virginia Ward Mediation Questionnaire due on 09/16/2021. Appellant Virginia Ward opening brief due 11/08/2021. Appellee Safeco Insurance Company of America answering brief due 12/08/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12224082] (JBS) [Entered: 09/09/2021 10:23 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Virginia Ward v. Safeco Insurance Company | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: VIRGINIA WARD | |
| Represented By: | Lincoln Palmer |
| Represented By: | Rex Palmer |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: SAFECO INSURANCE COMPANY OF AMERICA | |
| Represented By: | John E. Bohyer |
| Represented By: | Ryan Heuwinkel |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
