Jay Hymas v. USDOI, et al
| JAY HYMAS, DBA Dosmen Farms |
| U.S. DEPARTMENT OF THE INTERIOR, DEB HAALAND, Secretary of the United States Department of Interior and AURELIA SKIPWITH, Director of the United States Fish and Wildlife Service |
| 21-35793 |
| September 22, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 5, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MF): The court sua sponte consolidates these appeals. Appeal Nos. 21-35522 and 21-35793 are consolidated. On August 5, 2021, appellees filed a motion to dismiss the appeal from the final judgment as untimely, and to summarily affirm the district courts August 3, 2021 post-judgment order denying appellants motion for an extension of time to appeal (Appeal No. 21-35522, Docket Entry No.[ # 12192960-3 ]). To date, appellant has not filed a response to the motion. Within 28 days after the date of this order, appellant may file a response to appellees motion to dismiss and to summarily affirm. Appellees may file a reply within 14 days after service of appellants response. Briefing is stayed pending further order of the court. [12248169] [21-35522, 21-35793] (WL) [Entered: 10/05/2021 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jay Hymas opening brief due 11/19/2021. Appellees Deb Haaland, Aurelia Skipwith and U.S. Department of the Interior answering brief due 12/20/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12235549] (JBS) [Entered: 09/22/2021 10:19 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
