Bruce Copeland v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
Plaintiff / Appellant: BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND
Defendant / Appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-12, asset backed Certificates, Series 2006-12, An Ohio Corporation, AMY PHAM, DAVID CUNNINGHAM, THESSY ONYENEDUM, DAVID ONYENEDUYM, ATESA REAL ESTATE INC., ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN, Claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in this complaint adverse to plaintiff's title, or or any cloud on plaintiff's title thereto and DOES, 1-10
Case Number: 21-55766
Filed: July 20, 2021
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on September 2, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
September 2, 2021 Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMS, AWT and ADH) [12218555] (RL) [Entered: 09/02/2021 09:16 AM]
August 18, 2021 Filing 3 Received notification from District Court re: payment of docket fee. Amount Paid: USD 505.00. Date paid: 08/18/2021. [12204650] (BY) [Entered: 08/18/2021 11:12 AM]
August 11, 2021 Filing 2 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, A. WALLACE TASHIMA and ANDREW D. HURWITZ) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the July 1, 2021 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; see also Fed. R. App. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12199053] (WL) [Entered: 08/11/2021 04:26 PM]
July 20, 2021 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Bruce Dwain Copeland opening brief due 09/22/2021. Appellees All Persons Unknown, Atesa Real Estate Inc., David Cunningham, Does, Thessy Onyenedum, David Onyeneduym, Amy Pham and U.S. Bank National Association GSAA Home Equity Trust 2006-12 answering brief due 10/22/2021. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12178046] (RT) [Entered: 07/20/2021 03:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Bruce Copeland v. U.S. Bank National Association, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: BRUCE DWAIN COPELAND
Represented By: Bruce Dwain Copeland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: U.S. BANK NATIONAL ASSOCIATION GSAA HOME EQUITY TRUST 2006-12, asset backed Certificates, Series 2006-12, An Ohio Corporation
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: AMY PHAM
Represented By: Larry Rothman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID CUNNINGHAM
Represented By: Larry Rothman Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: THESSY ONYENEDUM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DAVID ONYENEDUYM
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ATESA REAL ESTATE INC.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: ALL PERSONS UNKNOWN, Claiming any legal or equitable right, title, estate, lien, or interest in the property described in this complaint adverse to plaintiff's title, or or any cloud on plaintiff's title thereto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: DOES, 1-10
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?