Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson
| JULIUS BRADFORD |
| CALVIN JOHNSON |
| 21-70273 |
| February 9, 2021 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 8, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 1 ENTRY UPDATED (DIOCKETING LETTER ATTACHED). ORIGINAL TEXT: Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) [11997044] Application for leave to file a second or successive petition filed. (Research) [11997044] --[Edited 02/09/2021 by BY][COURT UPDATE: New Documents Attached, resent NDA,--[Edited 02/09/2021 by BY](Original sent to SMS) (BY) [Entered: 02/09/2021 07:15 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Julius Bradford v. Calvin Johnson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: JULIUS BRADFORD | |
| Represented By: | Julius Bradford |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: CALVIN JOHNSON | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
