Linda Beeman v. John Cruz, et al
LINDA BEEMAN |
JOHN B. CRUZ, individually and as employee of the Amador County Sheriff's Department, AMADOR COUNTY SHERIFF'S OFFICE, COUNTY OF AMADOR and J. CORDOZA |
22-15696 |
May 9, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on June 7, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 3 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 06/21/2022, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12465999] (BLS) [Entered: 06/07/2022 06:26 PM] |
Filing 2 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Within seven (7) days of the filing date of this order, appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. [12452585] (LW) [Entered: 05/20/2022 01:13 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Linda Beeman Mediation Questionnaire due on 05/16/2022. Transcript ordered by 06/07/2022. Transcript due 07/07/2022. Appellant Linda Beeman opening brief due 08/16/2022. Appellees Amador County Sheriff's Office, J. Cordoza, County of Amador and John B. Cruz answering brief due 09/15/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12441371] (JMR) [Entered: 05/09/2022 10:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.