George Austin v. Lisa Atlina, et al
GEORGE JARVIS AUSTIN |
LISA NHU ATLINA, GALLAGHER BASSETT, EVERESTRE, SAN JOAQUIN GENERAL HOSPITAL, GUIDO GAITERI, SEAN PHILLIP DUCAR, U.S. DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH & HUMAN SERVICES, MARIBETH ARENDT, Bar #191843 and FEDERAL CIVIL RIGHTS PRIVACY ENFORCEMENT OFFICIALS, U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (handling Plaintiff's Complaint(s)) |
22-15966 |
June 29, 2022 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Medical Malpractice |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on August 26, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 10 Added Attorney(s) Robert M. Ferrier for party(s) Appellee Lisa Nhu Atlina Appellee Sean Phillip Ducar. [12527455] (RL) [Entered: 08/26/2022 02:12 PM] |
Filing 9 ENTRY UPDATED. Attorneys Robert M. Ferrier, Eric Kim substituted by Attorney Jenny Anne Silverstein. [12527301] [12527301]--[Edited 08/26/2022 by RL] (BJK) [Entered: 08/26/2022 12:27 PM] |
Filing 8 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jenny A. Silverstein (WOOD, SMITH, HENNING & BERMAN LLP 1401 Willow Pass Road, Suite 700 Concord, California 94520-7982) for Appellees Lisa Nhu Atlina and Sean Phillip Ducar. Substitution for Attorney Eric Kim for Appellees Lisa Nhu Atlina and Sean Phillip Ducar. Date of service: 08/26/2022. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12527268] [22-15966] (Silverstein, Jenny) [Entered: 08/26/2022 12:00 PM] |
Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin motion for reconsideration of dispositive Judge Order of 08/17/2022. Date of service: 08/18/2022. [12519814] [22-15966] (Austin, George) [Entered: 08/18/2022 11:44 AM] |
Filing 6 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, DIARMUID F. O'SCANNLAIN and DANIELLE J. FORREST) Appellants motion to stay appellate proceedings (Docket Entry No. [ # 2 ]) is denied. Appellees motion to dismiss this appeal for lack of jurisdiction (Docket Entry Nos. [ # 3 ], [ # 5 ]) is granted. See 28 U.S.C. 1291. DISMISSED. [12519320] (JBS) [Entered: 08/17/2022 04:50 PM] |
Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellee San Joaquin General Hospital Response joining motion ([ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing), [ # 3 ] Motion (ECF Filing) motion to dismiss the case). Date of service: 08/09/2022. [12512998] [22-15966] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 08/09/2022 by TYL] (Reihl, Lori) [Entered: 08/09/2022 11:12 AM] |
Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin Correspondence: Reminder of Mr. Austin's motion to stay proceeding until District Court rules, Fee Pay extension, and to date Atlina -Lisa Nhu is still in violation of 42 USC 1981, Unruh Anti-Discrimination laws, CMIA, HIPAA, and Mr. Austins other privacy rights. Date of service: 08/06/2022 [12511026] [22-15966] (Austin, George) [Entered: 08/06/2022 12:04 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellees Lisa Nhu Atlina and Sean Phillip Ducar Motion to dismiss the case. Date of service: 07/22/2022. [12500085] [22-15966] (Ferrier, Robert) [Entered: 07/22/2022 12:21 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant George Jarvis Austin EMERGENCY Motion to extend time to comply with the order dated 06/29/2022. Date of service: 07/06/2022. [12487474] [22-15966] (Austin, George) [Entered: 07/06/2022 01:37 PM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant George Jarvis Austin opening brief due 08/29/2022. Appellees Maribeth Arendt, Lisa Nhu Atlina, Gallagher Bassett, Sean Phillip Ducar, Everestre, Federal Civil Rights Privacy Enforcement Officials, Guido Gaiteri, San Joaquin General Hospital and U.S. Department of Health & Human Services answering brief due 09/29/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12482992] (RT) [Entered: 06/29/2022 11:27 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.