<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad v. Kimble, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/22-16609</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/22-16609/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 06:56:30 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 11 Jul 2026 06:56:30 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad v. Kimble, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 3</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (MMM, KMW and WAF) [12599736] (NAC) [Entered: 12/01/2022 07:38 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19019228</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 01 Dec 2022 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (M. MARGARET MCKEOWN, KIM MCLANE WARDLAW and WILLIAM A. FLETCHER) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12584265] (WL) [Entered: 11/09/2022 04:49 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19019227</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 09 Nov 2022 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Azuzallah Shaheed-Muhammad opening brief due 12/16/2022. Appellees James Babiar, David Carillo, R. Jacquez, Kimble and Caroline Milligan answering brief due 01/17/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12567258] (JMR) [Entered: 10/19/2022 10:18 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_18246889</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 19 Oct 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
