Kim Rogers v. Rob Bonta, et al
| KIM EDWARD ROGERS |
| ROB BONTA, California Attorney General, JIM COOPER, Sacramento Sheriff, GUADALUPE SANCHEZ, Manager, California sex offender registry and SCOTT JONES, Sacramento Sheriff |
| 22-16997 |
| December 27, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 3 MANDATE ISSUED. (KMW, RRC and GPS) [12656147] (BJK) [Entered: 02/17/2023 02:40 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ) : A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the December 19, 2022 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372- 73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable); In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); see also WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (en banc) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12639573] (RT) [Entered: 01/26/2023 12:42 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Kim Edward Rogers opening brief due 02/21/2023. Appellees Rob Bonta, Jim Cooper, Scott Jones and Guadalupe Sanchez answering brief due 03/22/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12618500] (JMR) [Entered: 12/27/2022 03:08 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
