Aguiluz Pelagio v. Garland
| MARITZA AGUILUZ PELAGIO, YULIANA ACUNA AGUILUZ and JESUS DANIEL ACUNA AGUILUZ |
| MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 22-295 |
| February 18, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on May 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 12
ORDER FILED. The court issued an order on March 31, 2022, directing petitioners to file a response within 28 days explaining why this petition should not be dismissed as duplicative of petition No. 22-297. To date, petitioners have not responded. Petition No. 22-295 is therefore dismissed for failure to prosecute. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order will be served on the agency and will become the mandate of the court in 21 days as to petition No. 22-295. Petition No. 22-297 remains pending. [Entered: 05/05/2022 04:17:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 04/04/2022 03:56:00 PM]
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER FILED. This petition appears to seek review of the same administrative order on review in petition No. 22-297. To proceed with this petition, petitioners must file a statement within 28 days of this order, explaining why this petition should not be dismissed as duplicative. If petitioners do not respond to this order, petition No. 22-295 will be dismissed, while petition No. 22-297 remains pending. The briefing schedule in petition No. 22-295 is stayed. [Entered: 03/31/2022 04:27:00 PM]
|
| Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 03/21/2022 07:49:00 AM] |
| Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed. [Entered: 03/18/2022 07:59:00 AM] |
| Filing 7 ADDED Jenny C. Lee for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/23/2022 10:11:00 AM] |
| Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Jenny C. Lee for Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 02/23/2022 09:26:00 AM] |
| Filing 5 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 3/25/2022, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 4/15/2022, Petitioner Opening Brief due 5/24/2022, Respondent Answering Brief due 7/25/2022. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:25:00 AM] |
| Filing 4 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:23:00 AM] |
| Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 2/17/2022. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 22-295 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/18/2022 09:21:00 AM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 1/18/2022. [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:11:00 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 02/17/2022 11:05:00 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
