Thomas Creech, et al v. Josh Tewalt, et al
Plaintiff: GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, Jr.
Defendant: BRAD LITTLE, Idaho State Governor, in his official capacity
Plaintiff / Appellant: THOMAS E. CREECH
Defendant / Appellee: JOSH TEWALT, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity, CHAD PAGE, Chief, Division of Prisons, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity, TIM RICHARDSON, Warden of the Idaho Maximum Security Institution and UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR CONTRACTORS OF THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, in their official capacities
Case Number: 22-35069
Filed: January 25, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
October 13, 2023 Summary THOMAS CREECH, ET AL V. JOSH TEWALT, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 4, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 4, 2022 Filing 4 Filed order (RONALD M. GOULD, JOHNNIE B. RAWLINSON and MARK J. BENNETT) We have accepted this appeal as a comeback case to appeal No. 20-36044. See 9th Cir. Gen. Order. 3.6. The schedule set on January 25, 2022 remains in effect. Oral argument, if any, will be set in due course. [12360764] (OC) [Entered: 02/04/2022 09:22 AM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 02/01/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12357449]. [22-35069] (AD) [Entered: 02/01/2022 12:44 PM]
February 1, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Thomas E. Creech Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 02/01/2022. [12357124] [22-35069] (Panikowski, Stanley) [Entered: 02/01/2022 10:20 AM]
January 25, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Thomas E. Creech Mediation Questionnaire due on 02/01/2022. Transcript ordered by 02/24/2022. Transcript due 03/24/2022. Appellant Thomas E. Creech opening brief due 05/02/2022. Appellees Chad Page, Tim Richardson, Josh Tewalt and Unknown Employees, Agents, or Contractors of the Idaho Department of Correction answering brief due 06/02/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12351255] (RT) [Entered: 01/25/2022 05:00 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Thomas Creech, et al v. Josh Tewalt, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellant: THOMAS E. CREECH
Represented By: Amanda Laufer Camelotto
Represented By: Jonah Horwitz
Represented By: Stanley Joseph Panikowski Esquire III
Represented By: William Miles Pope
Represented By: Christopher Michael Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: GERALD ROSS PIZZUTO, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: JOSH TEWALT, Director, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity
Represented By: Oscar Klaas
Represented By: Mark Kubinski Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: CHAD PAGE, Chief, Division of Prisons, Idaho Department of Correction, in his official capacity
Represented By: Oscar Klaas
Represented By: Mark Kubinski Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: TIM RICHARDSON, Warden of the Idaho Maximum Security Institution
Represented By: Oscar Klaas
Represented By: Mark Kubinski Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellee: UNKNOWN EMPLOYEES, AGENTS, OR CONTRACTORS OF THE IDAHO DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTION, in their official capacities
Represented By: Oscar Klaas
Represented By: Mark Kubinski Esquire
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRAD LITTLE, Idaho State Governor, in his official capacity
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?