<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Vicki Chang v. Andrew Vanderwielen, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/22-35460</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/22-35460/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:30:33 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 14:30:33 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Vicki Chang v. Andrew Vanderwielen, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 4</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (BGS, CMC and DPC) [12509248] (RL) [Entered: 08/04/2022 09:06 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_17358576</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 04 Aug 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (BARRY G. SILVERMAN, CONSUELO M. CALLAHAN and DANIEL P. COLLINS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 1291 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981) (order disposing of fewer than all claims against all parties not immediately appealable unless district court directs entry of judgment pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b)). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. All pending motions are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12492788] (OC) [Entered: 07/13/2022 11:39 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_17358575</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 13 Jul 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Vicki Chang FORM 24 motion for appointment of counsel. Deficiencies: None. Served on 06/16/2022. (Notice of change of address: 4216 37th Ave. S, Seatle, WA 98118) [12477676]--[Edited: address updated. 06/22/2022 by SLM] (RL) [Entered: 06/22/2022 03:39 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_17358574</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 22 Jun 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Vicki Chang opening brief due 08/09/2022. Appellees City of Seattle, Edward Collins, Jane Gurevich, Brian Hunt, Riddhi Kothari and Andrew Vanderwielen answering brief due 09/08/2022. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12469935] (JBS) [Entered: 06/13/2022 02:12 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_16728679</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 13 Jun 2022 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
