Kris Bennett v. Chris Hicks, et al
Defendant: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRITTANY PEREZ, WYATT HULL and JOHN DOE, Officer, CRCC
Plaintiff / Appellee: KRIS K. BENNETT
Defendant / Appellant: CHRIS HICKS, Correctional Unit Supervisor, CRCC
Case Number: 22-36046
Filed: December 22, 2022
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Prisoner-Civil Rights

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
December 14, 2023 KRIS BENNETT V. CHRIS HICKS, ET AL

Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on February 2, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
February 2, 2023 Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12644938] (VS) [Entered: 02/02/2023 01:20 PM]
January 27, 2023 Filing 6 MEDIATION CONFERENCE RESCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 02/02/2023, 1:00 p.m. Pacific Time. (originally scheduled on 01/26/2023 ). [12640679] (VS) [Entered: 01/27/2023 12:25 PM]
January 17, 2023 Filing 5 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): In addition to all other issues the parties wish to raise in their briefs, the parties are directed to address the basis for this courts jurisdiction over this appeal. See Ballou v. McElvain, 29 F.4th 413, 421 (9th Cir. 2022) (noting that this courts jurisdiction over an interlocutory appeal from the denial of qualified immunity at summary judgment is limited to the question of whether the defendant would be entitled to qualified immunity as a matter of law, assuming all factual disputes are resolved, and all reasonable inferences are drawn, in plaintiffs favor (citing Estate of Anderson v. Marsh, 985 F.3d 726, 731 (9th Cir. 2021))). The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. [12631361] (AF) [Entered: 01/17/2023 10:30 AM]
January 4, 2023 Filing 4 MEDIATION CONFERENCE SCHEDULED - DIAL-IN AssessmentConference, 01/26/2023, 1:00 p.m., PACIFIC Time. The briefing schedule previously set by the court remains in effect. See order for instructions and details. [12622300] (VS) [Entered: 01/04/2023 08:56 AM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 3 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 12/28/2022. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12619607]. [22-36046] (AD) [Entered: 12/28/2022 06:44 PM]
December 28, 2022 Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Chris Hicks Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 12/28/2022. [12619219] [22-36046] (Cook, Jocelyn) [Entered: 12/28/2022 12:56 PM]
December 22, 2022 Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Chris Hicks Mediation Questionnaire due on 12/29/2022. Transcript ordered by 01/20/2023. Transcript due 02/21/2023. Appellant Chris Hicks opening brief due 03/31/2023. Appellee Kris K. Bennett answering brief due 05/01/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12616510] (RT) [Entered: 12/22/2022 12:06 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Kris Bennett v. Chris Hicks, et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff / appellee: KRIS K. BENNETT
Represented By: Matthew F. Duggan
Represented By: Matthew F. Duggan Esquire I
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant / appellant: CHRIS HICKS, Correctional Unit Supervisor, CRCC
Represented By: Jocelyn E. Cook
Represented By: Nicholas Ulrich
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WASHINGTON STATE DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRITTANY PEREZ
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WYATT HULL
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: JOHN DOE, Officer, CRCC
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?