Khali Bey v. County of Los Angeles, et al
| KHALI MALIK BEY |
| COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES, DCFS, SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT, STANLEY MOSK COURTHOUSE, EDMUND D. EDELMAN CHILDREN COURTHOUSE, SHERRI R. CARTER, SABRINA HELTON, JOCELIN PENA, LASHAWNE YARBOROUGH, VICTOR VIRAMONTES, CITY OF LOS ANGELES POLICE DEPARTMENT, DEPARTMENT OF FAMILY AND CHILDREN SERVICES, JEFFERSON PARK TERRACE, JACKIE LACEY, GEORGE GASCON, BOBBI D. GAGLE, MONIQUE FISHER, MICHAEL MOORE and ALEX VILLANUEVA |
| 22-55125 |
| February 2, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Civil Rights |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on August 5, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 7 MANDATE ISSUED. (MMS, RDN and LVD) [12510291] (HH) [Entered: 08/05/2022 10:19 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed order (MARY M. SCHROEDER, RYAN D. NELSON and LAWRENCE VANDYKE) The district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found the action was frivolous. On February 2, 2022, this court ordered appellant to explain in writing why this appeal should not be dismissed as frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2) (court shall dismiss case at any time, if court determines it is frivolous or malicious). Upon a review of the record and the response to the courts February 2, 2022 order, we conclude this appeal is frivolous. We therefore deny appellants motion to proceed in forma pauperis (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]) and dismiss this appeal as frivolous, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DISMISSED. [12493635] (WL) [Entered: 07/14/2022 10:05 AM] |
| Filing 5 Received notice of change of address dated 02/10/2022 from. New address: 1905 S Western Ave., Suite 19187, Los Angeles, CA 90018. [12373487] (RR) [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:35 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Khali Malik Bey motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis with CJA Form 23. Deficiencies: None. [12373457] (RR) [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:21 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Khali Malik Bey statement that appeal should go forward. [12373453] (RR) [Entered: 02/17/2022 01:18 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis because it found that the action was frivolous. This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12359403] (CKP) [Entered: 02/02/2022 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Khali Malik Bey opening brief due 04/04/2022. [12358542] (RT) [Entered: 02/02/2022 11:01 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
