Jae Sun Chung v. MTC Financial, Inc., et al
| BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BYN Mellon, NEWREZ, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing and DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive |
| JAE SUN CHUNG, an individual |
| MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Trustee Corps and AUCTION.COM, INC., a California corporation, DBA Auction.Com |
| 22-56066 |
| November 17, 2022 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Consumer Credit |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 8 Filed order (KIM MCLANE WARDLAW, RICHARD R. CLIFTON and GABRIEL P. SANCHEZ) A review of the record and the responses to the courts November 23, 2022, order to show cause demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256, 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (noting that an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Joseph v. Off. of Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1028 (9th Cir. 1987) (A district courts grant of a motion to set aside a default judgment is not an appealable final order, where the setting-aside paves the way for a trial on the merits.). Nor may the appeal proceed under 28 U.S.C. 1292(b) where the district court has not issued the required certification. See 28 U.S.C. 1292(b). Accordingly, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. The motion to take judicial notice (Docket Entry No. [ # 6 ]) and the motion for an injunction pending appeal (Docket Entry No. [ # 7 ]) are denied as moot. DISMISSED. [12624630] (JBS) [Entered: 01/06/2023 11:17 AM] |
| Filing 7 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jae Sun Chung Motion for injunction pending appeal. Date of service: 12/27/2022. [12617910] [22-56066] (Oh, Yi) [Entered: 12/27/2022 10:17 AM] |
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellee MTC Financial, Inc. Motion to take judicial notice. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617445] --[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [5] .] (TYL) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:26 PM] |
| Filing 5 COURT DELETED INCORRECT ENTRY. Notice about deletion sent to case participants registered for electronic filing. Correct Entry: [ # 6 ]. Original Text: Filed (ECF) Appellee MTC Financial, Inc. reply to response to order to show cause dated 11/23/2022. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617432] [22-56066] (Steele, John) [Entered: 12/23/2022 03:06 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellee MTC Financial, Inc. reply to response to order to show cause dated 11/23/2022. Date of service: 12/23/2022. [12617396] [22-56066] (Steele, John) [Entered: 12/23/2022 02:35 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jae Sun Chung response to order to show cause dated 11/23/2022. Date of service: 12/14/2022. [12611053] [22-56066] --[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 12/15/2022 by TYL] (Oh, Yi) [Entered: 12/14/2022 06:32 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: LCC): A review of the record suggests that this court may lack jurisdiction over this appeal because the order challenged in the appeal may not be final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b); Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (A district court order is . . . not appealable [under 1291] unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b).); Bird v. Reese, 875 F.2d 256, 256 (9th Cir. 1989) (noting that an order denying a motion for default judgment is not a final appealable order); Joseph v. Off. of Consulate Gen. of Nigeria, 830 F.2d 1018, 1028 (9th Cir. 1987) (A district courts grant of a motion to set aside a default judgment is not an appealable final order, where the setting-aside paves the way for a trial on the merits.). Within 21 days after the date of this order, appellant shall either move for voluntary dismissal of the appeal or show cause why it should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. If appellant elects to show cause, a response may be filed within 10 days after service of the memorandum. If appellant does not comply with this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal pursuant to Ninth Circuit Rule 42-1. Briefing is suspended pending further order of the court.[12595127] (JBS) [Entered: 11/23/2022 01:24 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jae Sun Chung Mediation Questionnaire due on 11/25/2022. Appellant Jae Sun Chung opening brief due 01/17/2023. Appellees Auction.com, Inc. and MTC Financial, Inc. answering brief due 02/16/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12590546] (JBS) [Entered: 11/17/2022 03:41 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
| Search for this case: Jae Sun Chung v. MTC Financial, Inc., et al | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff / appellant: JAE SUN CHUNG, an individual | |
| Represented By: | Yi Yong Oh |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: MTC FINANCIAL, INC., a Delaware corporation, DBA Trustee Corps | |
| Represented By: | John Christopher Steele Esquire |
| Represented By: | John Christopher Steele |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant / appellee: AUCTION.COM, INC., a California corporation, DBA Auction.Com | |
| Represented By: | Regina J. McClendon |
| Represented By: | Meagan S. Tom |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: BANK OF NEW YORK MELLON CORP., an American worldwide banking and financial service holding company commonly known as BYN Mellon | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: NEWREZ, LLC, a Delaware corporation, Shellpoint Mortgage Servicing | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: DOES, 1 through 100, inclusive | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
