<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Matthew Houston v. Jerry Howell, et al :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/23-15059</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/23-15059/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 05:31:39 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 05:31:39 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Matthew Houston v. Jerry Howell, et al - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 5</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Matthew Travis Houston motion to reconsider. Deficiencies: None. Not dated. [12673913] (RL) [Entered: 03/14/2023 02:02 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20155560</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 14 Mar 2023 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN and BRIDGET S. BADE) This appeal is from the denial of appellants post-judgment motion to reopen and for production of documents. The request for a certificate of appealability is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); United States v. Winkles, 795 F.3d 1134, 1143 (9th Cir. 2015); Lynch v. Blodgett, 999 F.2d 401, 403 (9th Cir. 1993) (order). All pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [12671971] (ABT) [Entered: 03/10/2023 04:25 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20155559</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 10 Mar 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Matthew Houston addendum to motion for reconsideration. Not dated. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12661086] (RL) [Entered: 02/24/2023 01:40 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20155558</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 24 Feb 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed Appellant Matthew Houston motion for reconsideration. Deficiencies: None. Served on 01/31/2023. [12650579] (RL) [Entered: 02/10/2023 10:04 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20155557</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 09 Feb 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/04/2022. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12633564] (JMR) [Entered: 01/19/2023 09:28 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19428968</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 19 Jan 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
