<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Austin Martin v. Scott Nago :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/23-15209</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/23-15209/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:08:51 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2026 17:08:51 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Austin Martin v. Scott Nago - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 5</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED. (WCC, MDS and DAB) [12680170] (HH) [Entered: 03/23/2023 09:33 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20591592</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 23 Mar 2023 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed order (WILLIAM C. CANBY, MILAN D. SMITH, JR. and DANIEL A. BRESS) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the orders challenged in the appeal are not final or appealable. See 28 U.S.C. 1291; WMX Techs., Inc. v. Miller, 104 F.3d 1133, 1136 (9th Cir. 1997) (dismissal of complaint with leave to amend is not appealable); see also Branson v. City of Los Angeles, 912 F.2d 334, 336 (9th Cir. 1990) (denial of reconsideration of non-appealable order is itself not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12664568] (ABT) [Entered: 03/01/2023 09:33 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_20591591</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 01 Mar 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Added Attorney(s) Jennifer H. Tran for party(s) Appellee Scott T. Nago, in case 23-15209. [12654601] (NAC) [Entered: 02/16/2023 10:45 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19919337</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Jennifer H. Tran (425 Queen Street, Honolulu, Hawaii 96813) for Appellee Scott T. Nago. Date of service: 02/16/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12654412] [23-15209] (Tran, Jennifer) [Entered: 02/16/2023 09:48 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19919336</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 16 Feb 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Austin D. Martin opening brief due 04/17/2023. Appellee Scott T. Nago answering brief due 05/17/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12653677] (RT) [Entered: 02/15/2023 11:37 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_19919335</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 15 Feb 2023 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
