Eric Hodgson, et al v. Randle Roper, et al
| ERIC HODGSON |
| THOMAS W. BARTH, Attorney for Plaintiff Eric Hodgson and BARTH DALY LLP |
| RANDLE ROPER, PATRICK GUNN, JOHN FINEN, TRACY TERRILL, individually, and in his capacity as trustee of the Terrill Living Trust and VACAYA LLC, a Delaware Limited Liability Company |
| 23-15316 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Civil (Rico) |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 15, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed order (Deputy Clerk: RSK): Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties (Docket Entry No. [ # 4 ]), this appeal is voluntarily dismissed. Fed. R. App. P. 42(b). A copy of this order shall serve as and for the mandate of this court. [12674531] (AF) [Entered: 03/15/2023 11:01 AM] |
| Filing 4 Received copy of District Court order filed on 03/08/2023: Stipulation and order dismissing appeal. [12670447] (HH) [Entered: 03/09/2023 10:28 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: CKP): Order to show cause docket fee due [12668913] (CKP) [Entered: 03/07/2023 11:27 AM] |
| Filing 2 Entered appearance of Appellant Barth Daly LLP. [12667933] (RT) [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:27 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Transcript ordered by 04/05/2023. Transcript due 05/04/2023. Appellant Thomas W. Barth opening brief due 06/12/2023. Appellees John Finen, Patrick Gunn, Randle Roper, Tracy Terrill and Vacaya LLC answering brief due 07/12/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12667928] (RT) [Entered: 03/06/2023 01:23 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
