Kohen Uhuru v. Kathleen Allison, et al
| KOHEN DIALLO UHURU, AKA Priest, AKA Diallo Earl Uhuru |
| KATHLEEN ALLISON, Secretary, J. BENAVIDEZ, Warden and ROBERT BURTON, Warden |
| 23-15661 |
| May 3, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Habeas Corpus |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 27, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 MANDATE ISSUED. (JHN, MTF and JS) [12743591] (RL) [Entered: 06/27/2023 09:12 AM] |
| Filing 3 Filed order (JACQUELINE H. NGUYEN, MICHELLE T. FRIEDLAND and JENNIFER SUNG) A review of the record demonstrates that this court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the April 7, 2023 order challenged in the appeal is not final or appealable. See Serine v. Peterson, 989 F.2d 371, 372-73 (9th Cir. 1993) (magistrate judges findings and recommendations not appealable; premature appeal not cured by subsequent entry of final judgment by district court); In re San Vicente Med. Partners Ltd., 865 F.2d 1128, 1131 (9th Cir. 1989) (order) (magistrate judge order not final or appealable); Weygandt v. Look, 718 F.2d 952, 954 (9th Cir. 1983) (denial of appointment of counsel in a habeas proceeding is not appealable). Consequently, this appeal is dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. DISMISSED. [12728213] (WL) [Entered: 06/05/2023 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 2 Filed Appellant Kohen Diallo Uhuru letter dated 05/14/2023 re: Questions and statements concerning case. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12720015] (RL) [Entered: 05/22/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket. No COA order in district court. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12707879] (RT) [Entered: 05/03/2023 10:40 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
