Jingli Huang v. SBA, et al
| JINGLI HUANG, founder and owner of DLS US (SMLLC) |
| SMALL BUSINESS ADMINISTRATION, JANET YELLEN, in her official capacity as Secretary of the Treasury, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ISABEL GUZMAN, in her official capacity as Administrator of the Small Business Administration |
| 23-15797 |
| May 25, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutes - APA Review/Appeal |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on July 17, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Isabel Guzman, SBA, USA and Janet Yellen reply to response to Court order dated 05/31/2023. Date of service: 07/17/2023. [12756753] [23-15797] (Jeu, Christopher) [Entered: 07/17/2023 05:52 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jingli Huang Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 07/05/2023. [12750116]--[COURT ENTERED FILING to correct entry [ # 3 ].] (SLM) [Entered: 07/06/2023 04:06 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed (ECF) Appellant Jingli Huang response to Court order dated 05/31/2023. Date of service: 07/05/2023. [12749378] [23-15797]--[COURT UPDATE: Removed motion (filed correctly at entry [ # 4 ]). 07/06/2023 by SLM] (Huang, Jingli) [Entered: 07/05/2023 05:30 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: MCD): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court denied appellant leave to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal because it found that the the appeal is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12725607] (CKP) [Entered: 05/31/2023 12:25 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Jingli Huang opening brief due 07/25/2023. Appellees Isabel Guzman, Small Business Administration, United States of America and Janet Yellen answering brief due 08/25/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12722564] (RT) [Entered: 05/25/2023 10:43 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
