Donnell Bledsoe v. San Joaquin County Superior Court, et al
DONNELL BLEDSOE |
SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, GEORGE ABDULLAH, San Joaquin County Superior Court Judge, SPENCER SINCLAIR, Attorney for Pearlie Townes and JOHN M. HARRIS, Lawyer for San Joaquin County Superior Court |
23-15805 |
May 25, 2023 |
U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
Other Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
Description |
---|
DONNELL BLEDSOE V. SAN JOAQUIN COUNTY SUPERIOR COURT, ET AL |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 12, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 6 Filed original and 4 copies of Appellant Donnell Bledsoe opening brief of 25 pages (Informal: Yes). Served on 07/11/2023. [12753953] (KWG) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:25 PM] |
Filing 5 Received Appellant Donnell Bledsoe response to lack of subject matter jurisdiction. [12753917] (NAC) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:11 PM] |
Filing 4 Filed Appellant Donnell Bledsoe motion for Demarrer on Defendant's claim. Deficiencies: None. [12753913] (NAC) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:08 PM] |
Filing 3 Filed Appellant Donnell Bledsoe motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. [12753903] (NAC) [Entered: 07/12/2023 02:04 PM] |
Filing 2 Filed referral notice (Deputy Clerk: MCD: Referring to the district court for determination whether in forma pauperis status should continue for this appeal. [12725404] (CKP) [Entered: 05/31/2023 10:49 AM] |
Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Donnell Bledsoe opening brief due 07/24/2023. [12722900] (ABT) [Entered: 05/25/2023 03:13 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.