Scott Iceberg v. Whitman County, et al
| SCOTT FRANCIS ICEBERG |
| WHITMAN COUNTY and LORETTA E. LYNCH, Attorney General, in her official capacityd |
| 23-35156 |
| March 6, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Americans w/Disabilities Act-Othr |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 10, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 6 Filed (ECF) Appellant Scott Francis Iceberg Response to court order dated 03/08/2023. Date of service: 04/10/2023 [12692202] [23-35156]--[COURT UPDATE: Updated docket text to reflect correct ECF filing type. 04/10/2023 by SLM] (Iceberg, Scott) [Entered: 04/10/2023 11:25 AM] |
| Filing 5 Added Attorney(s) Sean M. King for party(s) Appellee Whitman County Appellee Loretta E. Lynch. [12674960] (RL) [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Sean Michael King (Evans, Craven & Lackie, P.S., 818 West Riverside Avenue, Suite 250, Spokane, Washington 99201) for Appellees Whitman County and Loretta E. Lynch. Date of service: 03/15/2023. (Party was previously proceeding pro se.) [12674928] [23-35156] (King, Sean) [Entered: 03/15/2023 04:11 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk shall serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12669789] (CKP) [Entered: 03/08/2023 01:19 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) Appellant Scott Francis Iceberg Motion to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Date of service: 03/07/2023. [12669364] [23-35156] (Iceberg, Scott) [Entered: 03/07/2023 08:41 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF PRO SE APPELLANT AND NO APPEARANCE FOR APPELLEES. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Scott Francis Iceberg opening brief due 05/03/2023. [12667700] (JMR) [Entered: 03/06/2023 11:20 AM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
