Sean Martin v. Hugo Cadena, et al
| SEAN KYLE MARTIN, AKA Sean K Bergquist |
| HUGO FERNANDEZ CADENA, Mailroom Employee at AHCC, BONNIE LONGINO, Mailroom Employee at AHCC, TRACY SCHNEIDER, HQ Correctional Manager, CHARLOTTE HEADLEY, Chief of Security (Publication Review Committee Chair), JOHN DOE, Publication Review Committee (Chair) and J MARTIN, Grievance Coordinator |
| 23-35161 |
| March 8, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Prisoner-Civil Rights |
Opinions
We have the following opinions for this case:
| Description |
|---|
| SEAN MARTIN V. HUGO CADENA, ET AL |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 7, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin reply to appellees response to appellants motion. Served on 04/03/2023 [12691735] (RL) [Entered: 04/07/2023 04:55 PM] |
| Filing 8 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin FORM 4 motion and affidavit for permission to proceed In Forma Pauperis. Deficiencies: None. Served on 04/03/2023. [12691732] (RL) [Entered: 04/07/2023 04:54 PM] |
| Filing 7 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin statement that appeal should go forward. Served on 04/03/2023. [12691729] (RL) [Entered: 04/07/2023 04:52 PM] |
| Filing 6 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin letter dated 03/20/2023 re: Notification of correct party listing. Paper filing deficiency: None. [12688675] (RL) [Entered: 04/04/2023 12:01 PM] |
| Filing 5 Filed (ECF) Appellees Hugo Fernandez Cadena, Charlotte Headley, Bonnie Longino and Tracy Schneider response opposing motion ([ # 4 ] Party Motion, [ # 3 ] Party Motion). Date of service: 03/23/2023. [12680726] [23-35161] (Brisbin, Sarah) [Entered: 03/23/2023 03:12 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin motion to order entire transcript. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/13/2023. [12676308] (RL) [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:09 PM] |
| Filing 3 Filed Appellant Sean Kyle Martin motion for leave to appeal on original record with no appendix. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/13/2023. [12676305] (RL) [Entered: 03/17/2023 12:07 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed clerk order (Deputy Clerk: JW): A review of the district courts docket reflects that the district court has certified that this appeal is not taken in good faith and has revoked appellants in forma pauperis status. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(a). This court may dismiss a case at any time, if the court determines the case is frivolous. See 28 U.S.C. 1915(e)(2). Within 35 days after the date of this order, appellant must: (1) file a motion to dismiss this appeal, see Fed. R. App. P. 42(b), or (2) file a statement explaining why the appeal is not frivolous and should go forward. If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellant also must: (1) file in this court a motion to proceed in forma pauperis, OR (2) pay to the district court $505.00 for the filing and docketing fees for this appeal AND file in this court proof that the $505.00 was paid. If appellant does not respond to this order, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal for failure to prosecute, without further notice. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellant files a motion to dismiss the appeal, the Clerk will dismiss this appeal, pursuant to Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure 42(b). If appellant submits any response to this order other than a motion to dismiss the appeal, the court may dismiss this appeal as frivolous, without further notice. If the court dismisses the appeal as frivolous, this appeal may be counted as a strike under 28 U.S.C. 1915(g). If appellant files a statement that the appeal should go forward, appellee may file a response within 10 days after service of appellants statement. The briefing schedule for this appeal is stayed. The Clerk will serve on appellant: (1) a form motion to voluntarily dismiss the appeal, (2) a form statement that the appeal should go forward, and (3) a Form 4 financial affidavit. Appellant may use the enclosed forms for any motion to dismiss the appeal, statement that the appeal should go forward, and/or motion to proceed in forma pauperis. [12670705] (CKP) [Entered: 03/09/2023 01:20 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCE OF COUNSEL AND PRO SE APPELLANT. SEND MQ: No. The schedule is set as follows: Appellant Sean Kyle Martin opening brief due 05/08/2023. Appellees Hugo Fernandez Cadena, John Doe, Charlotte Headley, Bonnie Longino, J Martin and Tracy Schneider answering brief due 06/05/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12669930] (ABT) [Entered: 03/08/2023 02:53 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
