Darren Millam, et al v. Energizer Brands, LLC, et al
| DARREN MILLAM and DONALD SPRINKEL, individually and on behalf of all others situated |
| ENERGIZER BRANDS, LLC and ENERGIZER HOLDINGS, INC. |
| 23-55192 |
| March 2, 2023 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other Statutory Actions |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 28, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 Streamlined request [8] by Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel to extend time to file the brief is approved. Amended briefing schedule: Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel opening brief due 05/31/2023. Appellees Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc. answering brief due 06/30/2023. The optional reply brief is due 21 days from the date of service of the answering brief. [12704736] (DR) [Entered: 04/28/2023 07:50 AM] |
| Filing 8 Filed (ECF) Streamlined request for extension of time to file Opening Brief by Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel. New requested due date is 05/31/2023. [12704709] [23-55192] (Schubert, Amber) [Entered: 04/27/2023 07:20 PM] |
| Filing 7 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: This case is RELEASED from the Mediation Program. All further inquiries regarding this appeal, including request for extensions of time, should be directed to the Clerk's Office. Counsel are requested to contact the Circuit Mediator should circumstances develop that warrant settlement discussions while the appeal is pending. [12687457] (VS) [Entered: 04/03/2023 10:56 AM] |
| Filing 6 MEDIATION ORDER FILED: By 03/29/2023, counsel to email Circuit Mediator regarding settlement potential. Include Ninth Circuit case name and number in subject line. This communication will be kept confidential, if requested, and should not be filed with the court. The existing briefing schedule remains in effect. SEE ORDER FOR DETAILS. [12674466] (VS) [Entered: 03/15/2023 10:34 AM] |
| Filing 5 The Mediation Questionnaire for this case was filed on 03/09/2023. To submit pertinent confidential information directly to the Circuit Mediators, please use the following # link . Confidential submissions may include any information relevant to mediation of the case and settlement potential, including, but not limited to, settlement history, ongoing or potential settlement discussions, non-litigated party related issues, other pending actions, and timing considerations that may impact mediation efforts.[12671131]. [23-55192] (AD) [Entered: 03/09/2023 06:44 PM] |
| Filing 4 Filed (ECF) Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel Mediation Questionnaire. Date of service: 03/09/2023. [12670942] [23-55192] (Schubert, Amber) [Entered: 03/09/2023 03:52 PM] |
| Filing 3 Added Attorney(s) Dominic Draye for party(s) Appellee Energizer Brands, LLC Appellee Energizer Holdings, Inc., in case 23-55192. [12667218] (BJK) [Entered: 03/03/2023 04:46 PM] |
| Filing 2 Filed (ECF) notice of appearance of Dominic E. Draye (Greenberg Traurig, LLP, 2375 East Camelback Road, Suite 800, Phoenix, AZ 85016) for Appellees Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc.. Date of service: 03/03/2023. (Party was previously proceeding with counsel.) [12666904] [23-55192] (Draye, Dominic) [Entered: 03/03/2023 01:30 PM] |
| Filing 1 DOCKETED CAUSE AND ENTERED APPEARANCES OF COUNSEL. SEND MQ: Yes. The schedule is set as follows: Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel Mediation Questionnaire due on 03/09/2023. Appellants Darren Millam and Donald Sprinkel opening brief due 05/01/2023. Appellees Energizer Brands, LLC and Energizer Holdings, Inc. answering brief due 05/30/2023. Appellant's optional reply brief is due 21 days after service of the answering brief. [12665917] (JMR) [Entered: 03/02/2023 12:03 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
