Arturo Gonzalez v. Kelly Santoro
Petitioner / Appellant: ARTURO GONZALEZ
Respondent / Appellee: KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Case Number: 23-55269
Filed: March 24, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 6, 2023 Filing 2 Filed Appellant Arturo Gonzalez motion for certificate of appealability. Deficiencies: None. Served on 03/30/2023. [12690711] (QDL) [Entered: 04/06/2023 03:01 PM]
March 24, 2023 Filing 1 Open 9th Circuit docket: needs certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 03/24/2023. Record on appeal included: Yes. [12681220] (WL) [Entered: 03/24/2023 10:54 AM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Arturo Gonzalez v. Kelly Santoro
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner / appellant: ARTURO GONZALEZ
Represented By: Arturo Gonzalez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent / appellee: KELLY SANTORO, Acting Warden
Represented By: Louis Karlin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?