Lopez-Campos, et al. v. Garland
Petitioner: VERONICA LOPEZ-CAMPOS and ANTHONY JOSUE MEJIA-LOPEZ
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Case Number: 23-873
Filed: May 8, 2023
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on October 6, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
October 6, 2023 Filing 18 MOTION to Reset Briefing Schedule filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/06/2023 07:26 AM]
October 6, 2023 Filing 17 RESPONSE to Motion to Remand (DE 13) filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 10/06/2023 07:22 AM]
October 2, 2023 Filing 16 MOTION to Remand filed by Petitioner Veronica Lopez-Campos. [Entered: 10/03/2023 12:51 PM]
October 2, 2023 Filing 15 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 14 by Petitioner Veronica Lopez-Campos is filed. Original and 7 copies. [Entered: 10/02/2023 03:07 PM]
October 2, 2023 Filing 14 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Veronica Lopez-Campos. [Entered: 10/02/2023 03:06 PM]
September 29, 2023 Filing 13 MOTION to Remand filed by Petitioner Veronica Lopez-Campos. [Entered: 09/29/2023 03:25 PM]
August 4, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER FILED. Petitioners motion (Docket Entry No. 11) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due October 10, 2023. The answering brief is due December 11, 2023. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 08/04/2023 10:33 AM]
July 24, 2023 Filing 11 MOTION to extend time to file opening brief filed by Petitioner Veronica Lopez-Campos, Petitioner Anthony Josue Mejia-Lopez. [Entered: 07/25/2023 11:47 AM]
June 30, 2023 Opinion or Order Filing 10 ORDER FILED. The government has filed a statement of non-opposition to the motion for stay of removal. The temporary stay of removal continues until the mandate issues unless the court orders otherwise. See 9th Cir. Gen. Ord. 6.4(c). [Entered: 06/30/2023 12:11 PM]
June 30, 2023 Filing 9 STATEMENT OF NON-OPPOSITION TO MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 06/30/2023 06:44 AM]
May 23, 2023 Filing 8 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office Of Immigration Review. [Entered: 05/23/2023 08:24 AM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 7 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Colin J. Tucker for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/09/2023 10:28 AM]
May 9, 2023 Filing 6 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Colin J. Tucker for Respondent Merrick B. Garland. [Entered: 05/09/2023 09:46 AM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 5 FEE PAID by Petitioner(s). (Receipt # 4709005764) [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:57 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 4 BRIEFING SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due 6/12/2023, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due 7/3/2023, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due 8/11/2023, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due 10/10/2023. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:54 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 3 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/8/2023. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 23-873 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:51 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 2 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s); REMOVAL STAYED pending further order of the court per General Order 6.4(c). [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:51 PM]
May 8, 2023 Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 05/08/2023 04:51 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Lopez-Campos, et al. v. Garland
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: VERONICA LOPEZ-CAMPOS
Represented By: Veronica Lopez-Campos
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: ANTHONY JOSUE MEJIA-LOPEZ
Represented By: Anthony Josue Mejia-Lopez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Represented By: Oil
Represented By: Colin J. Tucker
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?