Enriquez v. Williams, et al.
Plaintiff: ANTONIO ENRIQUEZ
Defendant: HAROLD WICKHAM, NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR., TIM GARRETT and GAIL WATERS, named as G. Waters
Case Number: 24-7046
Filed: November 21, 2024
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on January 8, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
January 8, 2025 Filing 9 MOTION to Reconsider Dispositive Order filed by Appellant Brian Williams, Sr., Appellant Harold Wickham, Appellant Tim Garrett, Appellant Gail Waters. [Entered: 01/08/2025 05:46 PM]
January 8, 2025 Filing 8 Attorney Chris Davis as Counsel for Appellant substituted for Attorney Victoria Charlene Corey, Leo Thomas Hendges. [Entered: 01/08/2025 11:42 AM]
January 8, 2025 Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Chris Davis for Appellant Brian Williams, Sr., Appellant Gail Waters, Appellant Harold Wickham, Appellant Tim Garrett replacing Leo Thomas Hendges, Victoria Charlene Corey. [Entered: 01/08/2025 09:08 AM]
January 7, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER FILED. Appellant has not filed a statement explaining why this appeal should not be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction, as ordered by this court on November 25, 2024. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. This order becomes the mandate of the court in 21 days. [Entered: 01/07/2025 03:24 PM]
December 20, 2024 Filing 5 RELEASED FROM MEDIATION (text only). This case is released from the court's mediation program. Counsel may contact the Circuit Mediation Office at ca09_mediation@ca9.uscourts.gov to discuss services available through the Mediation Program or to request a settlement assessment conference. Information regarding the mediation program may be found at www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 12/20/2024 12:44 PM]
November 29, 2024 Filing 4 MEDIATION ORDER (text only): Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 12/4/2024. The court of appeals' records do not indicate that appellant has filed a mediation questionnaire in accordance with Cir. R. 3-4. Appellant shall file a Mediation Questionnaire (#form07.pdf (uscourts.gov)) or dismiss the appeal voluntarily. Information about the mediation program may be found on the court's website: #www.ca9.uscourts.gov/mediation. [Entered: 11/29/2024 12:29 PM]
November 25, 2024 Opinion or Order Filing 3 ORDER FILED. On June 16, 2023, the district court denied appellants motion for summary judgment, in which appellants argued that they were entitled to qualified immunity. Appellants did not appeal that order within 30 days. See 28 U.S.C. 2107(a); Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(1)(A). On October 18, 2024 the district court granted a motion for reconsideration of the denial of appellees motion for summary judgment. The October 18, 2024 order does not appear to have made any new determination regarding qualified immunity, however. The court may therefore lack jurisdiction over this appeal. Within 21 days, appellants must either file a motion to voluntarily dismiss this appeal or file a statement explaining why it should not be dismissed. If appellants do not do so, the court will dismiss the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. If appellants file a statement, appellee may file a response within 10 days. Briefing is stayed. [Entered: 11/25/2024 02:51 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Mediation Questionnaire due (Appellant) 11/26/2024, Appeal Transcript Order Due (Appellant) 12/2/2024, Appeal Transcript Due (Appellant) 1/1/2025, Appeal Opening Brief Due (Appellant) 2/10/2025, Appeal Answering Brief Due (Appellee) 3/12/2025. For appeal no. 24-7046, 3:21-cv-00085-ART-CSD. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 11/21/2024 02:14 PM]
November 21, 2024 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:21-cv-00085-ART-CSD has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 24-7046 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 11/21/2024 02:08 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Enriquez v. Williams, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: HAROLD WICKHAM
Represented By: Mr. Leo Thomas Hendges
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: BRIAN WILLIAMS, SR.
Represented By: Mr. Leo Thomas Hendges
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: TIM GARRETT
Represented By: Mr. Leo Thomas Hendges
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: GAIL WATERS, named as G. Waters
Represented By: Mr. Leo Thomas Hendges
Represented By: Ms. Victoria Charlene Corey
Represented By: Mr. Chris Davis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: ANTONIO ENRIQUEZ
Represented By: Mr. Andrew Wong
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?