Sjoberg v. Henley, et al.
Petitioner: THOMAS JUSTIN SJOBERG
Respondent: JOHN HENLEY, CHARLES DANIELS and AARON DARNELL FORD
Case Number: 25-1565
Filed: March 11, 2025
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other
Docket Report

This docket was last retrieved on April 23, 2025. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.

Date Filed Document Text
April 23, 2025 Opinion or Order Filing 4 ORDER FILED. (TEXT ONLY) The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) for an extension of time to file the opening brief is granted. The opening brief is due June 23, 2025. The answering brief is due July 23, 2025. The optional reply brief is due within 21 days after service of the answering brief. [Entered: 04/23/2025 08:45 AM]
April 17, 2025 Filing 3 MOTION to Extend Time to File Brief filed by Appellant John Henley, Appellant Charles Daniels, Appellant Aaron Darnell Ford. [Entered: 04/17/2025 12:37 PM]
March 11, 2025 Filing 2 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 4/24/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 5/26/2025. For appeal no. 25-1565, 3:20-cv-00322-ART-CLB. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:36 PM]
March 11, 2025 Filing 1 CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:20-cv-00322-ART-CLB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-1565 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 03/11/2025 01:13 PM]

Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Sjoberg v. Henley, et al.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: THOMAS JUSTIN SJOBERG
Represented By: Richard F. Cornell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: JOHN HENLEY
Represented By: Ms. Elsa Felgar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: CHARLES DANIELS
Represented By: Ms. Elsa Felgar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: AARON DARNELL FORD
Represented By: Ms. Elsa Felgar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?