<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Sharp v. Thornell, et al. :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-2315</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-2315/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:00:20 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sat, 27 Jun 2026 17:00:20 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Sharp v. Thornell, et al. - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 4</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. Richard A. PAEZ, Milan D. SMITH, Jr. This appeal is from the denial of appellants 28 U.S.C. 2254 petition and motion for reconsideration. Appellants filing (Docket Entry No. 3) is construed as a request for a certificate of appealability and is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003); Martinez v. Shinn, 33 F.4th 1254, 1261 (9th Cir. 2022). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 08/15/2025 10:42 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30617235</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 15 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION for Miscellaneous Relief filed by Appellant Roger Allen Sharp. [Entered: 04/15/2025 01:05 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_29035625</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 14 Apr 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 02/27/2025. [Entered: 04/10/2025 01:08 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28374792</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 10 Apr 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:23-cv-00984-DJH has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-2315 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 04/10/2025 01:04 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28374793</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 10 Apr 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
