<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Curtis v. Anderson, et al. :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-5013</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-5013/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:27:45 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2026 06:27:45 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Curtis v. Anderson, et al. - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 6</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 6]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MANDATE ISSUED Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT. The judgment of this Court, entered 9/4/2025, takes effect this date. [Entered: 09/26/2025 09:03 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615749</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 26 Sep 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. (Sidney R. THOMAS, Barry G. SILVERMAN, Mark J. BENNETT) A district courts dismissal order is not final or immediately appealable under 28 U.S.C. 1291 unless it disposes of all claims as to all parties or unless judgment is entered in compliance with Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(b). Romoland Sch. Dist. v. Inland Empire Energy Ctr., LLC, 548 F.3d 738, 747 (9th Cir. 2008) (citing Chacon v. Babcock, 640 F.2d 221, 222 (9th Cir. 1981)); see also 28 U.S.C. 1291; Fed. R. Civ. P. 54(b). This court lacks jurisdiction over this appeal because the July 14, 2025 order did not dispose of all claims as to all parties. This appeal is therefore dismissed. See 9th Cir. R. 3-6(b) (if court determines it lacks jurisdiction, court may dismiss appeal without notice or further proceedings). DISMISSED. [Entered: 09/04/2025 11:17 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615750</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 04 Sep 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 3 by Appellant Devin Cristian Curtis is filed. Original and 0 copies. [Entered: 08/19/2025 02:10 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615751</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 19 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Appellant Devin Cristian Curtis. [Entered: 08/19/2025 02:09 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615752</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 18 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                SCHEDULE NOTICE. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 9/17/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 10/17/2025. For appeal no. 25-5013, 2:25-cv-00074-TOR. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1. [Entered: 08/08/2025 01:33 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615753</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 2:25-cv-00074-TOR has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-5013 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 08/08/2025 01:31 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_30615754</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 08 Aug 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
