Zavala Garcia, et al. v. Blanche
| ROSALVA ZAVALA GARCIA, J RAFAEL GARCIA VARGAS, J. G.Z., K. G.Z. and A. V.Z. |
| PAMELA BONDI, ATTORNEY GENERAL and TODD BLANCHE, ACTING ATTORNEY GENERAL |
| 25-6543 |
| October 16, 2025 |
| U.S. Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit |
| Other |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on April 8, 2026. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 24 Respondent Pamela Bondi substituted by Todd Blanche effective 04/08/2026. [Entered: 04/08/2026 12:36 PM] |
Filing 23
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 22) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Optional Reply Brief due 05/26/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 04/07/2026 01:46 PM]
|
| Filing 22 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia, Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner A. V.Z.. [Entered: 04/07/2026 08:55 AM] |
| Filing 21 CLERK ACTION: Answering Brief submitted at DE 20 by Respondent Pamela Bondi is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 04/02/2026 01:01 PM] |
| Filing 20 ANSWERING BRIEF submitted for filing by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 04/02/2026 10:10 AM] |
|
Filing 19
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 18) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 4/6/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 02/20/2026 01:55 PM]
|
| Filing 18 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 02/20/2026 08:15 AM] |
| Filing 17 CLERK ACTION: Opening Brief submitted at DE 16 by Petitioners is filed. No paper copies are required. [Entered: 02/05/2026 10:21 AM] |
| Filing 16 OPENING BRIEF submitted for filing by Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia, Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner A. V.Z.. [Entered: 02/04/2026 04:50 PM] |
| Filing 15 REPLY to Opposition to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 12) filed by Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia, Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner A. V.Z.. [Entered: 12/22/2025 05:12 PM] |
| Filing 14 ADDED Counsel for Petitioner Shannon J. Murphy [Entered: 12/22/2025 09:43 AM] |
| Filing 13 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Shannon J. Murphy for Petitioner A. V.Z., Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia. [Entered: 12/22/2025 06:22 AM] |
| Filing 12 OPPOSITION to Motion to Stay Removal (DE 3) filed by Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 12/15/2025 04:46 AM] |
|
Filing 11
ORDER FILED. Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief (DE 10) granted. Amended briefing schedule: Opening Brief Due (Petitioner) 2/4/2026, Answering Brief Due (Respondent) 3/6/2026. Optional Reply Brief due 21 days after service of Answering Brief. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. [Entered: 10/27/2025 11:13 AM]
|
| Filing 10 Streamlined Request for Extension of Time to File Brief filed by Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia, Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner A. V.Z.. [Entered: 10/27/2025 09:30 AM] |
| Filing 9 CERTIFIED ADMINISTRATIVE RECORD filed by DOJ Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Entered: 10/23/2025 08:56 AM] |
| Filing 8 ADDED Counsel for Respondent Gregory A. Pennington [Entered: 10/17/2025 09:45 AM] |
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Gregory A. Pennington for Respondent Pamela Bondi. [Entered: 10/17/2025 09:33 AM] |
| Filing 6 SCHEDULE NOTICE. Certified Administrative Record due (Respondent) 11/25/2025, Respondent Response to Stay Motion (Filed with PFR) due (Respondent) 12/16/2025, Immigration Petitioner Opening Brief due (Petitioner) 1/5/2026, Immigration Respondent Answering Brief due (Respondent) 2/3/2026. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule will result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:29 PM] |
| Filing 5 Under General Order 6.4, a temporary stay of removal is in effect until further order of the court. [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:28 PM] |
| Filing 4 CASE OPENED. Petition for Review has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 10/16/2025. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-6543 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants), review the #Appellate Practice Guide, and counsel for petitioner(s) should also review the #Immigration Outline and consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 3 MOTION TO STAY REMOVAL filed by Petitioner(s). [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 2 AGENCY DECISION on review dated 9/23/2025. [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:26 PM] |
| Filing 1 PETITION FOR REVIEW filed by Petitioner A. V.Z., Petitioner J Rafael Garcia Vargas, Petitioner J. G.Z., Petitioner K. G.Z., Petitioner Rosalva Zavala Garcia. [Entered: 10/16/2025 04:26 PM] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
