<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Goodlow v. Oliver, et al. :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-8088</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-8088/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:14:23 -0700</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Jul 2026 08:14:23 -0700</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Goodlow v. Oliver, et al. - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 9</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 9]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Kimberly Sandberg, representing Appellant Deljuan Marke Goodlow. [Entered: 05/26/2026 02:00 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35788950</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 8]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. Jacqueline H. NGUYEN, Roopali H. DESAI The motion (Docket Entry No. 7) by Kimberly Sandberg to be relieved as appellants counsel is granted. See 9th Cir. R. 4-1(e). Appellant is now proceeding without counsel. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually at Deljuan M. Goodlow (#1037348), Southern Desert Correctional Center, P.O. Box 208 Indian Springs, Nevada 89070. The motion (Docket Entry No. 6) for an extension of time to file a motion for reconsideration is granted. The motion for reconsideration is due July 7, 2026. [Entered: 05/26/2026 01:59 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35788951</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 26 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 7]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Kimberly Sandberg for Appellant Deljuan Marke Goodlow. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:44 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35788952</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 6]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Extend Time to File Petition for Rehearing filed by Appellant Deljuan Marke Goodlow. [Entered: 05/08/2026 09:43 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35788953</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 08 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. Richard C. TALLMAN, Milan D. SMITH, Jr. The request for a certificate of appealability (Docket Entry No. 4) is denied because appellant has not shown that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the petition states a valid claim of the denial of a constitutional right and that jurists of reason would find it debatable whether the district court was correct in its procedural ruling. Slack v. McDaniel, 529 U.S. 473, 484 (2000); see also 28 U.S.C. 2253(c)(2); Gonzalez v. Thaler, 565 U.S. 134, 140-41 (2012); Miller-El v. Cockrell, 537 U.S. 322, 327 (2003). Any pending motions are denied as moot. DENIED. [Entered: 04/24/2026 11:10 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35788954</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 24 Apr 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION for Certificate of Appealability filed by Appellant Deljuan Marke Goodlow. [Entered: 01/22/2026 09:50 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_33049271</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 22 Jan 2026 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                DISCLOSURE STATEMENT pursuant to FRAP 26.1 and CR 26.1-1 filed by Appellant Deljuan Marke Goodlow. [Entered: 01/05/2026 11:34 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_33049272</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                COA SCHEDULE NOTICE. Needs a certificate of appealability. Date COA denied in DC: 11/26/2025. [Entered: 12/29/2025 03:15 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_32201503</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 29 Dec 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:20-cv-00364-MMD-CLB has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-8088 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 12/29/2025 03:13 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_32201504</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 29 Dec 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
