<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>United States of America v. Swartz :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-952</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/25-952/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 06:41:21 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Sun, 15 Nov 2026 06:41:21 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>United States of America v. Swartz - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 10</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 10]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                TERMINATED participation of Counsel for Appellant Elizabeth Richardson-Royer, representing Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 03/24/2025 02:29 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396166</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 9]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. (William C. CANBY, Ryan D. NELSON, Danielle J. FORREST) A review of the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so insubstantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district courts order dated February 12, 2025. The motion (Docket Entry No. 3) by Elizabeth Richardson-Royer to withdraw as counsel in this appeal is granted. All other pending motions are denied as moot. The clerk will serve this order on former counsel and appellant individually. AFFIRMED. [Entered: 03/24/2025 02:20 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396167</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 24 Mar 2025 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 8]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Attorney Anne C. Hsieh as Counsel for Appellee substituted for Attorney William James Migler. [Entered: 03/07/2025 04:03 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396168</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 7]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                NOTICE OF APPEARANCE by Anne C. Hsieh for Appellee United States of America replacing William James Migler. [Entered: 03/07/2025 02:26 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396169</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 07 Mar 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 6]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Miscellaneous Pro Se Filings Filed. [Party has counsel] [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:30 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396170</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Proceed Pro Se filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Party has counsel] [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:28 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396171</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Party has counsel] [Entered: 02/19/2025 11:24 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396172</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 18 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Withdraw as Counsel filed by Elizabeth Richardson-Royer for Appellant Jesse Franklin Swartz. [Entered: 02/17/2025 07:44 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_28396173</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Mon, 17 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                SCHEDULE NOTICE. Sentence Imposed: N/A. Appeal Opening Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellant) 3/25/2025, Appeal Answering Brief (No Transcript Due) (Appellee) 4/24/2025. For appeal no. 25-952, 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1. All briefs shall be served and filed pursuant to FRAP 31 and 9th Cir. R. 31-2.1. Failure of the petitioner(s)/appellant(s) to comply with this briefing schedule may result in automatic dismissal of the appeal. See 9th Cir. R. 42-1 [Entered: 02/13/2025 02:09 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_27808149</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CASE OPENED. A copy of your notice of appeal / petition filed in 3:23-cr-00085-WHA-1 has been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 25-952 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the Case Opening Information (for #attorneys and #pro se litigants) and review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider contacting the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for help with the brief and argument. [Entered: 02/13/2025 02:07 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_27808150</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Thu, 13 Feb 2025 00:00:00 -0800
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
