<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="/xsl/rss2.xsl"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
    <channel>
        <title>Hollis v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana :: Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</title>
        <link>https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/26-2886</link>
        <atom:link href="https://dockets.justia.com/docket/circuit-courts/ca9/26-2886/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
        <pubDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 16:04:53 -0800</pubDate>
        <lastBuildDate>Fri, 06 Nov 2026 16:04:53 -0800</lastBuildDate>
        <generator>Justia Dockets &amp; Filings</generator>
        <copyright>Copyright 2026 Justia Inc</copyright>
        <description>Hollis v. United States District Court for the Central District of California, Santa Ana - Docket Entries - Showing 1 through 7</description>
                                    <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 7]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                Petition for Writ of Certiorari Filed. [Entered: 10/09/2026 11:49 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_38659146</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Fri, 09 Oct 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 6]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                ORDER FILED. (Michelle T. FRIEDLAND, Ryan D. NELSON, Bridget S. BADE) Petitioner has not demonstrated a clear and indisputable right to the extraordinary remedy of mandamus. See In re Mersho, 6 F.4th 891, 897 (9th Cir. 2021) (To determine whether a writ of mandamus should be granted, we weigh the five factors outlined in Bauman v. United States District Court.); Bauman v. U.S. Dist. Court, 557 F.2d 650 (9th Cir. 1977); see also In re U.S. Dept of Educ., 25 F.4th 692, 698-99 (9th Cir. 2022) (magistrate judge has authority under 28 U.S.C. 626 to enter nondispositive transfer order). The petition is denied. All pending motions are denied as moot. No further filings will be entertained in this closed case. DENIED. [Entered: 06/02/2026 09:39 AM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_35967636</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Tue, 02 Jun 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 5]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                MOTION to Proceed In Forma Pauperis filed by Petitioner Matthew James Hollis. [Entered: 05/06/2026 04:58 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34614551</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 4]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                SCHEDULE NOTICE for Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition. [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:35 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34614552</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 3]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                CASE OPENED. Your case opening documents have been received in the Clerk's office of the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit on 5/6/2026. The U.S. Court of Appeals docket number 26-2886 has been assigned to this case. All communications with the court must indicate this Court of Appeals docket number. Please carefully review the docket to ensure the name(s) and contact information are correct. It is your responsibility to alert the court if your contact information changes. Resources Available For more information about case processing and to assist you in preparing your brief, please review the #Appellate Practice Guide. Attorneys should consider the court's #Appellate Mentoring Program for assistance. [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:32 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34614553</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 2]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                EXHIBITS to Petition for a Writ of Mandamus and-or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Matthew James Hollis. [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:31 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34614554</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                        <item>
        <title>
                            <![CDATA[Document 1]]>
                    </title>
                <description>
            <![CDATA[
                PETITION for a Writ of Mandamus and/or Prohibition filed by Petitioner Matthew James Hollis. [Entered: 05/06/2026 02:31 PM]
            ]]>
        </description>
                    <guid isPermaLink="false">https://dockets.justia.com#entry_34614555</guid>
                <pubDate>
            Wed, 06 May 2026 00:00:00 -0700
        </pubDate>
    </item>
                </channel>
</rss>
