Vernard Evans v. Kathleen Sebeliu
Plaintiff - Appellant: Vernard Evans
Defendant - Appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Case Number: 11-5120
Filed: May 19, 2011
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Jobs

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
May 17, 2013 Summary Evans v. Sebelius

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
May 17, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 1207496398 OPINION filed [1436594] (Pages: 13) for the Court by Judge Tatel, CONCURRING OPINION (Pages: 7) by Judge Williams [11-5120]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Vernard Evans v. Kathleen Sebeliu
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Vernard Evans
Represented By: Ellen Kyriacou Renaud
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Kathleen Sebelius, Secretary, U.S. Department of Health & Human Services
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?