Prison Legal News v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Plaintiff - Appellant: Prison Legal News
Defendant - Appellee: Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Case Number: 13-5269
Filed: August 22, 2013
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act of 1974

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 5, 2015 Summary Prison Legal News v. Samuels

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 5, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 1207708731 OPINION filed [1555949] (Pages: 15) for the Court by Judge Randolph. [13-5269]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the U.S. Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Prison Legal News v. Charles E. Samuels, Jr.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Prison Legal News
Represented By: Lance T. Weber
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: Charles E. Samuels, Jr., Director, Federal Bureau of Prisons
Represented By: R. Craig Lawrence
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?