In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir
In Re - Petitioner: In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri
:
Case Number: 14-1203
Filed: October 14, 2014
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Other

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
June 23, 2015 Summary In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
June 23, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 1207714182 OPINION filed [1559094] (Pages: 27) for the Court by Judge Henderson. [14-1203]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Al-Nashir
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
In re - petitioner: In re: Abd Al-Rahim Hussein Muhammed Al-Nashiri
Represented By: Richard Kammen
Represented By: Michel David Paradis
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Represented By: Joseph Francis Palmer
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Represented By: John Fichter De Pue
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?