Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DHS
Plaintiff - Appellant: Judicial Watch, Inc.
Defendant - Appellee: United States Department of Homeland Security
Case Number: 16-5339
Filed: November 18, 2016
Court: U.S. Court of Appeals, D.C. Circuit
Nature of Suit: Freedom of Information Act of 1974

Opinions

We have the following opinions for this case:

Date Filed Description
July 17, 2018 Summary Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DHS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 1208043289 OPINION [1740921] filed (Pages: 23) for the Court by Judge Rogers, CONCURRING OPINION (Pages: 11) by Judge Pillard, DISSENTING OPINION (Pages: 17) by Judge Srinivasan. [16-5339]
Access additional case information on PACER

Access the Case Summary and Docket Report to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Search for this case: Judicial Watch, Inc. v. DHS
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff - appellant: Judicial Watch, Inc.
Represented By: Paul J. Orfanedes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant - appellee: United States Department of Homeland Security
Represented By: DOJ Appellate Counsel
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?